Archive for November, 2006

Recruiting: A Race without a Finish Line

The following is an article written by Renee Zemanski of SellingPower.com on line newsletter published on Wednesday, November 15, 2006

“Companies need to view recruiting as a process, not a one-time event”, says Steve Clark, president of New School Selling, a business development consulting firm that specializes in helping businesses grow sales revenues and profits.

“Recruiting to the sales manager is what prospecting is to a salesperson,” he says. “Just as a salesperson should have a pipeline of qualified prospects so should the manager have a ‘bank of people’ he or she can engage in the recruiting process. It should be ongoing and continuous.”

Clark’s advice is sound. According to a Hay Group survey, the least committed employees to a company are its salespeople.

The Philadelphia-based management consulting company reports that 38 percent of salespeople surveyed planned to leave their respective companies within two years. It’s a race that never ends for recruiters.

“People responsible for the recruiting must realize that recruiting is really their number one job because regardless of what else they do they’ve got to have the right people promoting their product,” says Clark. “Companies need to advertise for salespeople on a consistent, regular basis; they never know when they are going to need someone. And if they find a top performer, they can always replace a poor performer or define a new position.”

“Companies need to be more like football teams – they always need to be looking to replace talent,” Clark continues. “The person who is the weakest performer on the team should always feel that his job is in jeopardy. It sounds ruthless, but it’s the way of life in business – if you’re not performing, then you become replaceable. Salespeople who really are mediocre and shouldn’t be in sales in the first place are usually the only people who will have a problem with this type of culture. Top-performing salespeople, who are rare, will thrive in such a competitive environment.”

Clark says that by establishing this type of environment companies can eliminate complacency and elevate the total effectiveness of the whole organization. He also adds that the companies who make the mistake of waiting until they have an opening to recruit will fall into an impulsive mode. They try to fill a position quickly and end up hiring a mediocre performer because they were under stress to fill that position. It’s these types of hurdles that companies need to be prepared for.

“If you don’t have a contingency plan, you’ll find yourself in a reactive position,” he says. “It takes anywhere from 30 to 90 days to find a good salesperson. That’s why you have to keep your antenna up. For example, if you’re eating dinner in a restaurant, and your server has a magnetic personality, you should be asking yourself, ‘Could this person make a contribution to our company?’”

Clark also recommends staying in the fast lane of the recruiting game by attending job fairs, recruiting fairs, using college placement services continuously, and by developing a sales profile of the positions you have. Determine the psychological, personal, and emotional characteristics that the people filling these positions should have – these aren’t traits you can train, says Clark. Use testing to determine whether candidates fit this template. Once these characteristics are outlined, it is a matter of recruiting someone who matches up to at least 80 percent of the profile.

“The bottom line to sales success is job match,” says Clark. “Sales winners win because they are doing what they are naturally programmed to do. Others fail because they are trying to perform in a role that they are not naturally programmed for, and no amount of coaching, training, or mentoring can change someone’s natural programming. That’s why the hiring decision is the most important decision a sales manager will ever make.”

Your Limbic Brain Conspires to Keep You from Making Good Decisions

According to accepted neuroscience, we have three brains: our brain stem, which controls motor function, our limbic or emotional brain and our neo cortex or rational thinking brain.

Our limbic, emotional brain, which is some 400 million years older than our neo cortex is primitive. Its purpose is to ensure survival, and all the complicated emotions and behaviors that survival implies. It is here that our basest of instincts thrive: sex, fury, fight. It is short term oriented, visual, concrete and self centered, and it is not designed to deal with abstract, complex concepts and ideas.

Ruled by the limbic brain, our ancestors were obsessed with consuming vital resources to keep them alive. They were consumption oriented not savings oriented. They were short term, immediate gratification oriented. They never thought about storing and saving because they never knew if they were going to survive from one day to the next. Consequently, they consumed not saved.

According to Robert Trivers, an evolutionary biologist at Rutgers University, “There isn’t necessarily a stop mechanism in us that says, Relax, you’ve got enough. We’ve evolved to be maximizing machines.”

For our ancestors the best way to save for the future was to consume now. Eating as much as they could, whenever they could, they were able to store extra calories in their bodies, in the hopes that this would carry them through any lean times that lay ahead.

This ancestrally dominated mindset has created many modern day problems: the tendency to spend and consume without any regard to the long term consequences, the addiction to instant gratification and the rejection of self denial and sacrifice, lack of patience and civility in society, micro term decision making by business and political leaders and on and on and on.

According to some Evolutionary Psychologists, our thinking, analytical, neo cortex brain has not evolved to keep pace with our complex, break neck speed society. Consequently, we are trying to cope in a complicated, frenetic world by using a brain that was designed to deal with much more basic human needs.

If our rational, analytical, thinking neo-cortex were truly in charge of our behavior we would engage in rational, intelligent, and civilized ways, but one does not have to look far to see the consequences of a society void of rational thought and dominated by the short term, emotionally motivated limbic brain.

Next time you make a decision, any decision, ask yourself is this a thoroughly planned, rationally thought out decision or am I making a decision based on short term, emotional gratification? If you are truly self aware and honest your answer will astound you.

Blog Powered Websites
By ContentRobot